History of Buddhism: Theravada & Mahayana
Introduction
Buddha Artist Unknown 15th Century, Ming Dynasty Smithsonian Institution |
Chapters 11 and 12 of the textbook cover the Theravada and Mahayana traditions within Buddhism, with chapter 11 focusing on Theravada and chapter 12 focusing on Mahayana. “As mentioned earlier, the history of Buddhism is broadly divided between two great traditions, Theravada (also known as Hinayana) and Mahayana. Over time, Mahayana would become the larger and historically more influential movement”(Bresnan 243). This post will discuss two questions from the textbook, one from the end of each chapter, in order to reach a better understanding of the certain aspects of Buddhism’s plentiful history.
Theravada Buddhism
Question #1: What does it mean to say that in the centuries following Buddha’s death, there was no Buddhism?
Following the death of Buddha, the leaders of the Theravada movement would come together in order to hold the first council of Buddhism. Buddhism has been held together largely by these councils, as the teachings of Buddha’s lessons had reached a diverse group of people spread all over Northern India. These councils had shown that the traditions of Buddhism were growing despite struggles, and continued to spread to more people would were to become devout followers of Buddhism’s many teachings.
Despite the continuation of Buddha’s teachings prompted by these councils. The term “Buddhism” implies that the followers of Buddhism had formed behind a defined movement, but this was true. “It would stand beside, and perhaps be in conflict with, other precisely defined movements, such as Jainism or Hinduism. This was surely not the case. The followers of Buddha’s teachings never encountered the concept of Buddhism”(Bresnan 246). So while the teachings of Buddha continued to spread, it would not be accurate to say that “Buddhism” was defined at the time.
Mahayana Buddhism
Question #2: How did early Mahayanist defend their contention that the Mahayana scriptures were authentic sutras?
Fasting Buddha Shakyamuni Artist Unknown 3rd-5th Century Pakistan Metropolitan Museum |
“The Mahayanists responded to attacks on the veracity of their sutras by arguing that Prajnaparamita and other sutras were not new at all. They had been passed from directly from Buddha to some specially chosen disciples”(Bresnan 265). The Mahayanists claimed that not all of Buddha’s teachings could be shared at the time, and that the world was simply not ready for them. These sutras were said to be just as legitimate as the ones known to the Theravadins by the Mahayanists.
Conclusion
Buddhism has a rich, interesting history that anyone can learn something from. It’s history far eclipses what could be contained in a single blog post and is something I would recommend to anyone with the slightest bit of interest in the school of thought.
Below is a YouTube video titled "History of Theravada Buddhism: Very Old and Very New" by Doug's Dharma, offering a more in-depth history of Theravada Buddhism that is easily digestible.
Work Cited
Bresnan, Patrick S. AWAKENING : An Introduction to the History of Eastern Thought.
S.L., Routledge, 2021.
“History of Theravada Buddhism: Very Old and Very New.”
Www.youtube.com, www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0B1xqTjt50. Accessed 23
Oct. 2021.
“Buddha.” Smithsonian Institution, www.si.edu/object/buddha:fsg_S2012.9.4474.
Accessed 21 Oct. 2021.
Metmuseum.org, 2020, www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/38119.
Comments
Post a Comment